It’s common knowledge that sources, routes and networks for certain energies and their benefits increases the likelihood of conflicts. Different pieces of energy framework and logical circumstances matter for such contentions, especially when the characteristics of energy systems are powerful when combined. Along with the aspects of the energy system that put focus on them, it is important to examine and accept the adaptability of humans and societies does require to change to ensure a balanced and sustainable future. The term and characteristics that define “energy” will also modify over time from conventional features as known now in parallel with civilisation’s technological progress. In conflicts, the role of energy varies significantly hence it can serve as a primary cause and objective, be it an instrument used in a conflict or a secondary cause. Let’s elaborate the role of Energy as conflicts.
Energy as a Primary Cause and Objective
In conflicts driven by the pursuit of energy resources, the central aim is to control, secure, or access valuable energy sources such as oil or natural gas, electricity, renewable and clean energy. Typically occurring in regions abundant in these resources, states or other entities engage in conflicts for economic or strategic gains. These conflicts are intertwined with issues of resource scarcity, geopolitical, sometimes ideological power struggles, and economic interests. For instance, conflicts over natural-resources regions often revolve around gaining control of these resources for economic and political advantages. Access to energy resources plays a critical role in determining a nation’s economic stability, military strength, and international influence, sparking competition and potential conflict, particularly in situations of scarcity or uneven distribution of resources. Concerns over legitimacy arise when states resort to aggression or violate international norms to secure energy resources, inviting condemnation or retaliation from the international community.
Energy as an Instrument in a Conflict
Energy can also be used as a tool or weapon in conflicts, even if it is not the primary objective. Parties involved in a conflict may use disruptions and undetectable miscalibration in supply of the much-needed energy, such as cutting off oil or gas pipelines, as a means to retaliate, exert pressure or coerce their opponents. Energy infrastructure, including pipelines, refineries, and power plants, may become targets for sabotage or military strikes during conflicts. Energy infrastructure becomes vulnerable during conflicts, potentially impacting civilians and amplifying humanitarian crisis. For instance, during times of heightened geopolitical tensions, regions may threaten to disrupt energy supplies to their adversaries or impose economic sanctions targeting the energy sector. The use of energy as leverage in diplomatic negotiations or as a tool of economic warfare is a common strategy employed by various entities in conflicts.
Energy as a Secondary Cause
In some conflicts, energy may not be the primary cause or objective but can still play a significant role as a secondary factor. Economic disparities, political grievances, ethnic tensions, or territorial disputes may be the primary drivers of the conflict, but control over energy resources or access to energy infrastructure could exacerbate existing tensions or prolong conflicts. For example, competition over energy resources could exacerbate existing conflicts in regions with a history of ethnic or territorial disputes. Access to reliable energy supplies may also be a factor in post-conflict reconstruction and stability efforts, as lack of access to energy can hinder economic development and social stability. Other examples: climate change, driven by fossil fuel dependence, can lead to resource scarcity, migration, and competition for land and water, indirectly contributing to conflicts. The long-term impacts of energy choices (e.g., environmental degradation) can create underlying tensions and contribute to instability, although these factors might not be the immediate triggers for conflict.
Different Roles of Energy in Conflict
Advantages. Clarity of Goals: focusing on energy security simplifies negotiations and solutions. National Security: ensuring energy access enhances a nation’s security and reduces vulnerability to disruptions. Potential for Cooperation: shared energy dependence fosters cooperation and resource management agreements.
Disadvantages. Increased Competition: energy resource competition can escalate into violent conflict, especially with scarcity. Legitimacy Concerns: provocative and aggressive actions violate international norms, causing instability and distrust. Short-term Focus: prioritising energy security over sustainability can lead to long-term disadvantages. Geopolitical Tensions: competing for energy resources heightens geopolitical tensions and conflict risks. Resource Curse: reliance on energy exports fosters instability, corruption, and inequality. Environmental Degradation: long-term energy extraction damages the environment, contributing to habitat destruction and climate change.
Energy as an Instrument in a Conflict
Advantages. Negotiation Leverage: manipulating energy supplies offers states diplomatic leverage in negotiations. Non-lethal Tactics: energy-related strategies like sanctions exert pressure without military force, averting direct conflict. Deterrence: threatening energy disruptions deters aggression, maintaining regional stability. Strategic Advantage: controlling energy infrastructure thus its output provides tactical advantages in conflicts.
Disadvantages. Civilian Impact: targeting energy infrastructure harms civilians, violating international law. Conflict Escalation: weaponising energy provokes retaliation, escalating violence and potential destruction. Infrastructure Damage: energy disruptions hinder post-conflict reconstruction efforts. Humanitarian Crisis: energy disruptions harm vulnerable populations dependent on energy for their basic needs. Economic Fallout: energy conflicts disrupt global markets, causing economic uncertainty. Escalation Risk: using energy in conflicts escalates tensions, leading to broader instability.
Energy as a Secondary Cause
Advantages. Addressing Root Causes: recognising energy’s role helps tackle underlying economic, social, disparity and environmental issues. Opportunities for Cooperation: energy security fosters collaboration and conflict resolution among states. Sustainable Development: integrating energy considerations promotes post-conflict sustainable development. Shifting Focus: recognising energy’s role redirects attention to deeper issues like resource scarcity and climate change. Long-term Solutions: transitioning to renewables reduces resource competition, fostering environmental sustainability.
Disadvantages. Complexity: addressing energy’s role requires complex, global cooperation due to its indirect nature. Competing Priorities: balancing climate change and energy security may conflict with other national interests. Unequal Impact: transitioning to renewables affects countries and communities differently, requiring support for vulnerable populations. Complexity: energy issues intersect with various dynamics, complicating conflict resolution and stability efforts. Competing Interests: conflicting stakeholder interests over energy resources hinder cooperation and prolong conflicts. Long-term Challenges: achieving sustainable energy security demands long-term planning and cooperation among diverse entities, presenting practical challenges.
“Energy as Conflict” Theories
The relationship between energy and conflict is a multifaceted issue explored across various disciplines, including political science, international relations, geopolitics, and energy studies. While there isn’t one single theory or theorist defining this relationship, several perspectives contribute to our understanding:
Geopolitical Theory. Theorists: Halford Mackinder, Nicholas Spykman. Focus: Analyses how geographical factors and resources, including energy, influence international relations and potential conflicts.
Resource Curse Theory. Theorists: Paul Collier, Jeffrey Sachs. Focus: Suggests that abundant natural resources like oil can hinder economic development and foster conflict due to corruption and mismanagement.
Security Studies. Theorists: Barry Buzan, Ken Booth. Focus: Expands the definition of security to encompass environmental, economic, and social aspects, highlighting energy competition’s link to broader security challenges.
Critical Geopolitics. Focus: Examines socio-political dimensions of energy production, distribution, and consumption, critiquing traditional approaches to energy security.
International Political Economy (IPE). Focus: Investigates economic dimensions of energy conflicts, including the role of multinational corporations and international institutions in shaping energy geopolitics.
Energy Security Discourse. Focus: Emphasises the importance of reliable energy access for economic and political stability, acknowledging the potential for competition and conflict.
Transition Studies. Focus: Explores challenges and opportunities associated with transitioning to renewable energy sources, considering social and economic impacts.
These perspectives collectively contribute to understanding the complexities of energy-related conflicts and inform policy discussions on energy security, sustainability, and global governance.
Who holds the Upper hand
Those who hold significant control over energy resources can take various measures to maintain or enhance their strategic advantage. To maintain strategic advantage in energy resources, they can:
Diversify Energy Sources: Investing in varied energy portfolios reduces dependency on single sources, enhancing resilience. Expand Infrastructure: Building robust energy infrastructure improves supply chain efficiency and reliability. Forge Strategic Alliances: Establishing partnerships secures access to markets, technology, and investment opportunities. Invest in Technology: advanced energy tech reduces costs, creates transparency, promotes sustainability, and encourages healthy competition. Enhance Security Measures: Protecting critical infrastructure safeguards against threats, provocation-tactic for energy diversion, disruptions, and misuse. Promote Energy Diplomacy: Participating in forums and agreements fosters stability in global energy markets. Ensure Regulatory Stability: Transparent regulations encourage investment and market confidence. Address Environmental Concerns: Tackling environmental issues builds credibility and public trust. Embrace Corporate Responsibility: Ethical practices enhance stakeholder relationships and trust. Monitor Geopolitical Risks: Assessing risks aids proactive decision-making in dynamic landscapes.
For broader perspectives, additional efforts may be considered:
Collaborate and Share Resources: Partnering ensures equitable access and fosters trust. Transparency and Accountability: Open policies combat exploitation and corruption. Invest in Sustainability: Transitioning to renewables mitigates environmental impacts. Prioritise Social Development: Invest in communities to address inequalities and tensions. Foster International Cooperation: Engage in dialogue and agreements for global stability. Asymmetric Warfare: Use unconventional tactics to disrupt invasion plans and undermine aggressors and corruptors. Resource Protection: Secure critical infrastructure from attacks, deception and sabotage. Cyber Defence: Strengthen cybersecurity to defend against digital threats. Psychological Operations: Shape public opinion and target morale.
In threatening situations, maintaining advantage is relevant, but ethical considerations remain important. Offensive strategies may include defensive military actions, diplomatic appeals, and international cooperation to deter invasion. Balancing power with responsibility is crucial for sustainable, renewable energy and development. The human and environmental toll of conflict is profound. Any offensive strategy involving energy resources risks loss of life, infrastructure damage, and environmental degradation. Escalation and unintended consequences are real threats, potentially destabilising regions and harming innocent civilians. However, conducive and cooperative solutions should be preferred. By managing energy resources responsibly and diplomatically, emphasising collaboration, transparency, and sustainability, we can strive for a future where energy benefits all, rather than being used for domination or conflict.
About The Author
