This article looks into the compelling notion that money, when utilised effectively, can indeed be a powerful force for positive change on a global scale. From historical acts of heroism to modern-day initiatives tackling some problems, the examples cover here of how financial resources have been instrumental in addressing some of the world’s most pressing challenges. However, the road to fully-accept the potential of money as “problem solver” is full with obstacles. Deep-seated attitudes, power dynamics, and the pervasive desire for control are some of the factors that hinder progress and perpetuate ongoing problems. Moreover, the taboo surrounding discussions of wealth and the expectations surrounding its use in particular way further-complicate efforts to leverage money to its upmost potential. By embracing Reciprocity and its principles of equal transaction, mutual respect, and accountability, societies can navigate the complexities of wealth and new power dynamics. Those who want real change, must rethink about the intersection of money, power, and reciprocity, examining how these forces shape the world.
Money has long been regarded as a force capable of addressing a wide range of challenges and obstacles. From personal hardships to global crises, the belief persists that with sufficient financial resources, any problem can be overcome. This assertion finds support in the research of self-made millionaire Steve Siebold, who has spent over 30 years studying more than 1,200 of the world’s wealthiest individuals. Contrary to common misconceptions, Siebold’s findings suggest that everyone in principle has the same opportunity to acquire wealth. He contends that rich people are willing to acknowledge – contrary to popular belief – an uncomfortable truth about money: it can solve most problems. Rather than viewing money as a corrupting force, wealthy individuals in the test sample see it as useful and productive tool that creates opportunities, options, happiness, and resolution. This perspective challenges common beliefs and negative propaganda about money, thus encourages individuals to adopt a more positive mindset towards wealth. By seeing money as a tool for empowerment rather than a source of stress, Siebold suggests that individuals can unlock their and others potential for success and security. From alleviating immediate needs to driving innovation and progress, financial resources play a pivotal role in addressing a wide range of challenges. Investments in research, technology, welfare as well as infrastructure, drive advancements that improve lives and create opportunities for growth and development. Moreover, money can serve as a powerful tool enabling individuals and communities to assert their rights, advocate for society interests, and drive positive change.
Despite the presence of many well-meaning wealthy individuals, why haven’t global issues been resolved? The answers are not as complicated as you think. The ideals of a future world may include individualism, free markets, competition, comfort and wealth, but that right-leaning concept can only work properly and not exploitatively in the presence of high-standard level of ethics. At present, there seems to be a taboo against wealthy individuals supporting progressive causes or advocating for social and systemic change. It may be true that some individuals may face backlash or criticism from certain segments of society when they publicly align themselves with truth-finding causes, hence the universal taboo may actually serve as a secret code. Social expectations within affluent circles may also pressure conformity to certain do’s and dont’s as well as behaviour, discouraging support for genuine causes beyond their immediate social circles. You probably know first-hand several affluent individuals, families, and businesses committed to philanthropy, social responsibility, and using their resources to benefit others and society. On the other hand, there may be some other individuals who may well exhibit selfish behaviour or prioritise their own interests above others. Analysing the cause-and-effect relationship of the factors above, it can be concluded that a large sum of money – in the current state of the world – is typically considered as acceptable tool for addressing socio-economic issues and effecting positive change expected only through corporate responsibilities or official activities. Important to note is that while philanthropic can certainly have significant positive impacts, they may not always address the underlying systemic issues that perpetuate social, economic, and environmental challenges. There are several reasons why this may be the case. Many efforts tend to address the symptoms rather than the root causes of systemic issues. While initiatives like providing social support, healthcare or disaster relief can alleviate immediate suffering, they may not tackle the underlying fundamental issues. Addressing systemic issues requires coordinated action and willingness across sectors and stakeholders, posing complex challenges but not impossible ones.
Money as Means of Control
Money, from its inception, has served various functions beyond its simple role as a medium of exchange. While it facilitates transactions and economic activity, it has also been wielded as a mechanism for control and influence. Throughout history, those who possess wealth have often wielded significant power over others, shaping societal structures, influencing strategic and tactical decisions, and determining access to resources and opportunities. In this way, money has been used not only to accumulate material wealth but also to consolidate power, perpetuating existing hierarchies. This instrumentalisation of money for control rather than genuine problem-solving exacerbates systemic issues and reinforces chaos. Thus, while money has the potential to be a powerful tool for addressing real-world problems, its unwise use as means for control undermines its potential for positive impact that it should ideally have. While acknowledging the potential for misuse, it’s essential to recognise that money also plays a positive role in driving economic activity and addressing societal challenges. Balancing the benefits and risks associated with money’s influence is crucial in fostering transparency and removing unnecessities in economic and social systems. It’s important to recognise that attempts at control through money may ultimately be futile if they are not aligned with ethical principles or if they go against the natural flow of universal progress. History has shown that societies built on coercion and inequality are not only inherently untrusted, but also unstable and often collapse under the weight of their contradictions. So, while money can indeed be used as a means of control, its effectiveness in achieving long-term goals ultimately depends upon ethical considerations and alignment with the principles of equal transaction (reciprocity). Attempts to manipulate or coerce others through financial means may yield short-term gains but are never to succeed in the face of collective forces and the naturally-inherent desire for autonomy and dignity. It has been proven time and time again, the most undefeated power is a coalition of conducive and sustainable force adhering to universal dictating laws. In other words, while money can be influential and potentially solve world’s most complex problems, its true power are when it is used in conjunction with cooperation and alignment with ethical principles.
Questioning Altruism: Myth or Reality
From the Crusades to the Vietnam War, historical narratives abound with instances of remarkable humanitarian efforts intertwined with financial considerations. During the Crusades, religious orders like the Knights Hospitaller and Knights Templar provided vital medical care and shelter to civilians amid conflict. With their heroic endeavours, they often relied on money to sustain their operations. Oskar Schindler, prior to World War II, demonstrated extraordinary courage by protecting Jewish labourers in his enamelware factory in Krakow, Poland. His actions, though noble, required plenty of financial transactions and connections in both the Nazi government and black-market world to ensure the safety of his workers. In parallel with the Holocaust, the Kindertransport initiative orchestrated by Nicholas Winton and Trevor Chadwick saved numerous children from Nazi-occupied Europe. Their efforts, while heroic, involved cross-organisation logistical coordination and considerably large amounts of financial backings and transactions to secure transportation and protect individuals and families. Chiune Sugihara, serving as the Japanese consul in Lithuania, issued visas in returns for financial transactions to refugees fleeing Nazi persecution. During the Vietnam War, Hugh Thompson Jr.’s intervention to stop the My Lai Massacre showcased bravery and moral integrity. With financial backings involved, Thompson prioritised the protection of Vietnamese civilians. In the late 19th century, both Thomas Edison and Michael Faraday made groundbreaking contributions to science and technology, shaping the modern world as we know it. Edison’s inventions, including the phonograph and electric light bulb, revolutionised daily life, but their realisation required substantial financial backing from wealthy investors. Similarly, Faraday’s pioneering work in electromagnetism and electrochemistry paved the way for modern technologies, but he faced financial constraints due to his humble background. However, with support from financial backers, Faraday overcame these obstacles, showcasing the critical role of financial investment in driving innovation and progress. These historical accounts underscore the intricate relationship between impactful acts and financial requirements, highlighting the pragmatic considerations often associated with endeavours that can help others.
The stories of these heroes, innovators and humanitarians suggest that in their noble endeavours, some or more types of financial resources and monetary transactions have long been used to initiate and facilitate operations, procure supplies, bribe officials, diplomatic manoeuvres and other uses of personal and professional connections, and other necessities. Although our heroes’ actions were undoubtedly altruistic, there were instances where individuals provided compensation in the form of money, family heirloom, jewellery and other forms of precious items in exchange for reciprocity, e.g. transport, permission, safety, opportunity to live, or assistance. Regarding the perception about the involvement of wealthy families being prioritised in the rescue efforts – as they were the ones most able to pay the fee needed – only historical facts can tell the truths in each and particular story. The issue of commissions or financial arrangements is a matter of historical debate and interpretation. It clearly highlights the nuanced role that money can play in addressing complex and most-pressing problems, especially in the most extreme circumstances, such as saving lives and addressing injustices. While their actions may have involved financial transactions or fees and commissions, the ultimate outcome was the preservation of lives that matter. However, while money can be a force for good, it can also be misused or exploited for nefarious purposes such as extortion, money laundering, or ransom. It is essential to know the difference of the use of financial resources with integrity, transparency, and a commitment to ethical principles. So, the people in the stories are perceived selfless and innovative in their time and provided help and support to those in real needs in order to survive. A closer examination reveals that some of these acts of apparent altruism may have been driven by more complex motivations, including financial transactions. The stories highlighted, while undoubtedly heroic, often involved the exchange of financial resources or transactions to initiate and facilitate operations, procure supplies, bribe officials, or leverage personal and professional connections. Ultimately, these stories serve as a powerful reminder of the complex interplay between money, ethics, and values, where money – complimented with ethics and willingness – can be use responsibly and compassionately in order to make a meaningful difference in the lives of others. These stories also serve as a reminder of the capacity for individuals to make a real difference, even in the darkest of times, as long as they have the resources to do so. In the end, it is the lives saved and the impact they had on countless individuals and families that define their legacies and inspire us to strive for goodness and decency in the face of adversity. It is a testament to the power of will and action and the importance of standing up for what is right.
Reciprocity: The Only Way Forward
Altruism, at its core, involves a genuine concern for the well-being of others and a willingness to act in their best interests. While altruism is commendable, it’s essential to recognise the limitations of relying solely on selflessness to address societal challenges. Instead, individuals should embrace personal responsibility and empowerment as key drivers of positive change. It is also essential to maintain healthy boundaries and ensure that the altruism does not lead to exploitation or enable harmful one-way symbiotic behaviours, instead of two-way (mutualism). These intrinsic rewards can reinforce altruistic behaviour and contribute to overall well-being. With limitations, and of course, weighing its pros and cons. Ultimately, the key in finding a balance between selflessness and self-interest, recognising that both are inherent and natural aspects of human nature, where we all thrive for eventual self-actualisation (Maslow pyramid). The unrealistic concept of altruism may have over time been romanticised and melancholically shaped as to how most humans are expected (in a fait accompli, non-challenging manner) to be altruistic (read selfless). Interestingly enough, this expectation is only applicable to certain types of humanity, and not across the board. As for those who are strongly opposed to the concept of Master and Slave relationship, many experts and philosophers have been challenging the basis or rationale behind this ‘pick and choose’ paradigm and ‘role assignment’.
Reciprocity, the principle of mutual exchange, embodies the spirit of individual empowerment. In a free-market society, individuals engage in voluntary exchanges based on mutual benefit, aiming for cooperation, trust, and prosperity. This principle encourages individuals to contribute to society while also seeking opportunities for personal growth and advancement. In social psychology, reciprocity is often observed as the most ideal form of social norm, where individuals are obligated to return favours, gifts, transactions, or acts of kindness they have received from others. In applying the principle of reciprocity, people recognise the importance of value and accountability in their interactions. They understand that success is earned through hard work, innovation, and collaboration, rather than entitlement or coercion. Not all interactions can perhaps be neatly balanced in terms of equal transactions, but currency makes it easier for transactions to be valued and calculated. Impartiality plays a crucial role in determining the value of reciprocity, especially in monetary transactions. For instance, consider the example of product A and product B: while product A may be deemed of higher quality and valued at $200, product B, with lesser quality, may be valued at $50. Impartiality ensures that transactions are based on the calculated value and costs of the exchanged goods or services, rather than subjective preferences or other agendas. The role of profit is recognised in determining the value of goods and services, but it is important to also assess and consider the actual worth or price represented by the products and their design, security, features and functionalities exchanged to not perpetuate distrust from the transaction partners, be they misleading, unethical, overpriced or underpriced. This approach emphasises the importance of understanding the true value of items in transactions, promoting a more transparent and conscientious form of reciprocity. Human relationships are complex and multifaceted, often involving logical, impartial, subjective, emotional, social, and cultural factors that transcend simple exchanges of goods or services. Finding the balance within reciprocal mutualism, between giving and receiving, has to be calculated wisely in order to maintain productivity, motivation, impact as well as to cultivate healthy, meaningful relationships, and contribute to an impartial and balanced world.
With the firm belief that money does in fact can solve most problems, its transformative potential should not be underestimated. While money undeniably holds the potential to address the most complex, any world challenges, its real optimised power is sometimes hindered by deep-seated attitudes and the pervasive desire for control by some. The taboo surrounding the “proper” use of money by certain expected norms and behaviours further-complicate efforts to harness its full potential for positive change. However, amidst these challenges, reciprocity has to start claiming the role as the guiding principle, offering a pathway towards a more equitable and harmonious society. By embracing the principles of impartiality, mutual respect, and accountability, societies can navigate the complexities of wealth and power dynamics, encouraging cooperation and trust. We can potentially build a brighter, more secure future for all, where the exchange of resources and opportunities is governed by principles of reciprocity. In each of the examples explored, from historical acts of heroism to modern-day innovation, enabling individuals and organisations to respond effectively to the most significant crises of its time, save lives, create modernisation and alleviate suffering. It further strengthens the principle of the importance of both money and reciprocity underscores the fundamental truth that the principal of human’s connectivity demands a balance between giving and receiving, for any “transaction” to really work. With sufficient financial resources, coupled with ethical leadership, collaboration, and a commitment to addressing root causes, the world altogether can potentially overcome many of the most pressing challenges facing the planet and its climate. For those blessed with wealth, there is a unique opportunity to make a difference through strategic investment, innovation and entrepreneurship. As with great wealth comes great responsibility, it is imperative to use wealth wisely and ethically, start breaking the barrier and taking proactive steps to address systemic issues that perpetuate toxic cycles, and act conscientiously to ensure positive outcomes for themselves and society at large. If you acknowledge the existence of a toxic cycle that demands attention, by embracing the power of money in conjunction with other critical, fact-based factors, you can help to ensure the world does not have to relive such stories above, and can progress to build a more equitable and sustainable world for generations to come.
About The Author
